Vitomir Arapovic vs David Berczes
40. Bosna Open, 2010 · Result 0–1 · Caro-Kann Defense: Two Knights Attack, Mindeno Variation (B11).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Vitomir Arapovic vs David Berczes with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Vitomir Arapovic (2366)
- Black
- David Berczes (2519)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 40. Bosna Open
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Caro-Kann Defense: Two Knights Attack, Mindeno Variation (B11)
About this chess game
This chess game between Vitomir Arapovic (2366) and David Berczes (2519) was played at 40. Bosna Open in 2010 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Caro-Kann Defense: Two Knights Attack, Mindeno Variation (B11). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Vitomir Arapovic games or David Berczes games? This Vitomir Arapovic vs David Berczes encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Caro-Kann Defense: Two Knights Attack, Mindeno Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Vitomir Arapovic vs David Berczes?
Vitomir Arapovic vs David Berczes (2010) finished 0–1, a win for David Berczes.
What opening was played in Vitomir Arapovic vs David Berczes?
The game opened with the Caro-Kann Defense: Two Knights Attack, Mindeno Variation (ECO B11).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Vitomir Arapovic vs David Berczes, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.