Alvaro Zimmermann Aranha Filho vs Joao Danilo Mandetta
2015 · Result ½–½ · Benoni Defense: Old Benoni (A43).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alvaro Zimmermann Aranha Filho vs Joao Danilo Mandetta with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Alvaro Zimmermann Aranha Filho (2266)
- Black
- Joao Danilo Mandetta (2260)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Benoni Defense: Old Benoni (A43)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alvaro Zimmermann Aranha Filho (2266) and Joao Danilo Mandetta (2260) was played in 2015 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Benoni Defense: Old Benoni (A43). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alvaro Zimmermann Aranha Filho games or Joao Danilo Mandetta games? This Alvaro Zimmermann Aranha Filho vs Joao Danilo Mandetta encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Benoni Defense: Old Benoni.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alvaro Zimmermann Aranha Filho vs Joao Danilo Mandetta?
Alvaro Zimmermann Aranha Filho vs Joao Danilo Mandetta (2015) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Alvaro Zimmermann Aranha Filho vs Joao Danilo Mandetta?
The game opened with the Benoni Defense: Old Benoni (ECO A43).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alvaro Zimmermann Aranha Filho vs Joao Danilo Mandetta, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.