Jose Joaquin Araiza Munoz vs John Harold Belson
1934 · Result 1–0 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation (E36).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jose Joaquin Araiza Munoz vs John Harold Belson with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jose Joaquin Araiza Munoz (2225)
- Black
- John Harold Belson
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 1934
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation (E36)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jose Joaquin Araiza Munoz (2225) and John Harold Belson was played in 1934 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation (E36). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jose Joaquin Araiza Munoz games or John Harold Belson games? This Jose Joaquin Araiza Munoz vs John Harold Belson encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jose Joaquin Araiza Munoz vs John Harold Belson?
Jose Joaquin Araiza Munoz vs John Harold Belson (1934) finished 1–0, a win for Jose Joaquin Araiza Munoz.
What opening was played in Jose Joaquin Araiza Munoz vs John Harold Belson?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation (ECO E36).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jose Joaquin Araiza Munoz vs John Harold Belson, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.