Izaak Appel vs Mojsesz Lowtzky
1937 · Result 0–1 · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation, Geller Variation (A33).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Izaak Appel vs Mojsesz Lowtzky with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Izaak Appel
- Black
- Mojsesz Lowtzky
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 1937
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation, Geller Variation (A33)
About this chess game
This chess game between Izaak Appel and Mojsesz Lowtzky was played in 1937 and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation, Geller Variation (A33). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Izaak Appel games or Mojsesz Lowtzky games? This Izaak Appel vs Mojsesz Lowtzky encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation, Geller Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Izaak Appel vs Mojsesz Lowtzky?
Izaak Appel vs Mojsesz Lowtzky (1937) finished 0–1, a win for Mojsesz Lowtzky.
What opening was played in Izaak Appel vs Mojsesz Lowtzky?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation, Geller Variation (ECO A33).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Izaak Appel vs Mojsesz Lowtzky, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.