Alessandro Antonelli vs Bruno Della Sala
C.to Italiano di Categoria C, 2012 · Result 0–1 · Benoni Defense: Four Pawns Attack (A68).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alessandro Antonelli vs Bruno Della Sala with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Alessandro Antonelli (1973)
- Black
- Bruno Della Sala (1901)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- C.to Italiano di Categoria C
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Benoni Defense: Four Pawns Attack (A68)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alessandro Antonelli (1973) and Bruno Della Sala (1901) was played at C.to Italiano di Categoria C in 2012 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Benoni Defense: Four Pawns Attack (A68). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alessandro Antonelli games or Bruno Della Sala games? This Alessandro Antonelli vs Bruno Della Sala encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Benoni Defense: Four Pawns Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alessandro Antonelli vs Bruno Della Sala?
Alessandro Antonelli vs Bruno Della Sala (2012) finished 0–1, a win for Bruno Della Sala.
What opening was played in Alessandro Antonelli vs Bruno Della Sala?
The game opened with the Benoni Defense: Four Pawns Attack (ECO A68).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alessandro Antonelli vs Bruno Della Sala, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.