Ray Ankit vs Singhal Swastik
Indian U15 Championships | Boys, 2023 · Result ½–½ · English Opening: Agincourt Defense, Neo-Catalan Declined (A14).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ray Ankit vs Singhal Swastik with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ray Ankit (1898)
- Black
- Singhal Swastik (1611)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- Indian U15 Championships | Boys
- Year
- 2023
- Opening
- English Opening: Agincourt Defense, Neo-Catalan Declined (A14)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ray Ankit (1898) and Singhal Swastik (1611) was played at Indian U15 Championships | Boys in 2023 and finished ½–½. The opening was the English Opening: Agincourt Defense, Neo-Catalan Declined (A14). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ray Ankit games or Singhal Swastik games? This Ray Ankit vs Singhal Swastik encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Agincourt Defense, Neo-Catalan Declined.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ray Ankit vs Singhal Swastik?
Ray Ankit vs Singhal Swastik (2023) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Ray Ankit vs Singhal Swastik?
The game opened with the English Opening: Agincourt Defense, Neo-Catalan Declined (ECO A14).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ray Ankit vs Singhal Swastik, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.