Anantha P Anilkumar vs Nick W Faulks
4NCL Division 3s, 2015 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Modern Variation (B42).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Anantha P Anilkumar vs Nick W Faulks with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Anantha P Anilkumar (1881)
- Black
- Nick W Faulks (2075)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- 4NCL Division 3s
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Modern Variation (B42)
About this chess game
This chess game between Anantha P Anilkumar (1881) and Nick W Faulks (2075) was played at 4NCL Division 3s in 2015 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Modern Variation (B42). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Anantha P Anilkumar games or Nick W Faulks games? This Anantha P Anilkumar vs Nick W Faulks encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Modern Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Anantha P Anilkumar vs Nick W Faulks?
Anantha P Anilkumar vs Nick W Faulks (2015) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Anantha P Anilkumar vs Nick W Faulks?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Modern Variation (ECO B42).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Anantha P Anilkumar vs Nick W Faulks, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.