Jaime Anguera Maestro vs Carles Albert Estebanez
2017 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D05).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jaime Anguera Maestro vs Carles Albert Estebanez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jaime Anguera Maestro (2106)
- Black
- Carles Albert Estebanez (1751)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D05)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jaime Anguera Maestro (2106) and Carles Albert Estebanez (1751) was played in 2017 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D05). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jaime Anguera Maestro games or Carles Albert Estebanez games? This Jaime Anguera Maestro vs Carles Albert Estebanez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jaime Anguera Maestro vs Carles Albert Estebanez?
Jaime Anguera Maestro vs Carles Albert Estebanez (2017) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Jaime Anguera Maestro vs Carles Albert Estebanez?
The game opened with the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (ECO D05).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jaime Anguera Maestro vs Carles Albert Estebanez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.