Juan Carlos Angel Acosta vs Jose Luis Galvan Sarmiento
2012 · Result ½–½ · Semi-Slav Defense Accepted (D44).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Juan Carlos Angel Acosta vs Jose Luis Galvan Sarmiento with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Juan Carlos Angel Acosta (2184)
- Black
- Jose Luis Galvan Sarmiento (1929)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Semi-Slav Defense Accepted (D44)
About this chess game
This chess game between Juan Carlos Angel Acosta (2184) and Jose Luis Galvan Sarmiento (1929) was played in 2012 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Semi-Slav Defense Accepted (D44). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Juan Carlos Angel Acosta games or Jose Luis Galvan Sarmiento games? This Juan Carlos Angel Acosta vs Jose Luis Galvan Sarmiento encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Semi-Slav Defense Accepted.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Juan Carlos Angel Acosta vs Jose Luis Galvan Sarmiento?
Juan Carlos Angel Acosta vs Jose Luis Galvan Sarmiento (2012) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Juan Carlos Angel Acosta vs Jose Luis Galvan Sarmiento?
The game opened with the Semi-Slav Defense Accepted (ECO D44).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Juan Carlos Angel Acosta vs Jose Luis Galvan Sarmiento, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.