Ricardo Sarmento Andrade vs Valeri Petkov
XVII Profigaia Open 2017, 2017 · Result 0–1 · English Opening: Agincourt Defense (A13).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ricardo Sarmento Andrade vs Valeri Petkov with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ricardo Sarmento Andrade (1754)
- Black
- Valeri Petkov (2484)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- XVII Profigaia Open 2017
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- English Opening: Agincourt Defense (A13)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ricardo Sarmento Andrade (1754) and Valeri Petkov (2484) was played at XVII Profigaia Open 2017 in 2017 and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: Agincourt Defense (A13). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ricardo Sarmento Andrade games or Valeri Petkov games? This Ricardo Sarmento Andrade vs Valeri Petkov encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Agincourt Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ricardo Sarmento Andrade vs Valeri Petkov?
Ricardo Sarmento Andrade vs Valeri Petkov (2017) finished 0–1, a win for Valeri Petkov.
What opening was played in Ricardo Sarmento Andrade vs Valeri Petkov?
The game opened with the English Opening: Agincourt Defense (ECO A13).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ricardo Sarmento Andrade vs Valeri Petkov, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.