William T Anderson Smith vs Kim Anderson
Adelaide Interclub, date unknown · Result 0–1 · Queen's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation (E15).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay William T Anderson Smith vs Kim Anderson with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- William T Anderson Smith (1625)
- Black
- Kim Anderson (2094)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Adelaide Interclub
- Opening
- Queen's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation (E15)
About this chess game
This chess game between William T Anderson Smith (1625) and Kim Anderson (2094) was played at Adelaide Interclub and finished 0–1. The opening was the Queen's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation (E15). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more William T Anderson Smith games or Kim Anderson games? This William T Anderson Smith vs Kim Anderson encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won William T Anderson Smith vs Kim Anderson?
William T Anderson Smith vs Kim Anderson finished 0–1, a win for Kim Anderson.
What opening was played in William T Anderson Smith vs Kim Anderson?
The game opened with the Queen's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation (ECO E15).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of William T Anderson Smith vs Kim Anderson, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.