Mad Andersen vs Nathan Birnboim
16. ch-EUR Indiv 2015, 2015 · Result 1–0 · English Opening: Agincourt Defense, Neo-Catalan Declined (A14).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Mad Andersen vs Nathan Birnboim with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Mad Andersen (2494)
- Black
- Nathan Birnboim (2349)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 16. ch-EUR Indiv 2015
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- English Opening: Agincourt Defense, Neo-Catalan Declined (A14)
About this chess game
This chess game between Mad Andersen (2494) and Nathan Birnboim (2349) was played at 16. ch-EUR Indiv 2015 in 2015 and finished 1–0. The opening was the English Opening: Agincourt Defense, Neo-Catalan Declined (A14). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Mad Andersen games or Nathan Birnboim games? This Mad Andersen vs Nathan Birnboim encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Agincourt Defense, Neo-Catalan Declined.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Mad Andersen vs Nathan Birnboim?
Mad Andersen vs Nathan Birnboim (2015) finished 1–0, a win for Mad Andersen.
What opening was played in Mad Andersen vs Nathan Birnboim?
The game opened with the English Opening: Agincourt Defense, Neo-Catalan Declined (ECO A14).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Mad Andersen vs Nathan Birnboim, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.