Arman Ananian vs Raquel Pablos Tenrero
3. Oliver Gonzalez Mem Open A, 2012 · Result 1–0 · Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation (B13).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Arman Ananian vs Raquel Pablos Tenrero with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Arman Ananian (1889)
- Black
- Raquel Pablos Tenrero (1996)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 3. Oliver Gonzalez Mem Open A
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation (B13)
About this chess game
This chess game between Arman Ananian (1889) and Raquel Pablos Tenrero (1996) was played at 3. Oliver Gonzalez Mem Open A in 2012 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation (B13). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Arman Ananian games or Raquel Pablos Tenrero games? This Arman Ananian vs Raquel Pablos Tenrero encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Arman Ananian vs Raquel Pablos Tenrero?
Arman Ananian vs Raquel Pablos Tenrero (2012) finished 1–0, a win for Arman Ananian.
What opening was played in Arman Ananian vs Raquel Pablos Tenrero?
The game opened with the Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation (ECO B13).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Arman Ananian vs Raquel Pablos Tenrero, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.