Mohammed Bishara Amer vs Mohammed A Al Amri
2015 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (D37).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Mohammed Bishara Amer vs Mohammed A Al Amri with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Mohammed Bishara Amer (1849)
- Black
- Mohammed A Al Amri (1456)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (D37)
About this chess game
This chess game between Mohammed Bishara Amer (1849) and Mohammed A Al Amri (1456) was played in 2015 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (D37). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Mohammed Bishara Amer games or Mohammed A Al Amri games? This Mohammed Bishara Amer vs Mohammed A Al Amri encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Mohammed Bishara Amer vs Mohammed A Al Amri?
Mohammed Bishara Amer vs Mohammed A Al Amri (2015) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Mohammed Bishara Amer vs Mohammed A Al Amri?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (ECO D37).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Mohammed Bishara Amer vs Mohammed A Al Amri, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.