Ismael Amador Garcia vs Marcos Adrian Perez Felipe
2019 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation (B51).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ismael Amador Garcia vs Marcos Adrian Perez Felipe with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ismael Amador Garcia (2157)
- Black
- Marcos Adrian Perez Felipe (2154)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation (B51)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ismael Amador Garcia (2157) and Marcos Adrian Perez Felipe (2154) was played in 2019 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation (B51). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ismael Amador Garcia games or Marcos Adrian Perez Felipe games? This Ismael Amador Garcia vs Marcos Adrian Perez Felipe encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ismael Amador Garcia vs Marcos Adrian Perez Felipe?
Ismael Amador Garcia vs Marcos Adrian Perez Felipe (2019) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Ismael Amador Garcia vs Marcos Adrian Perez Felipe?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation (ECO B51).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ismael Amador Garcia vs Marcos Adrian Perez Felipe, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.