Fernando Pereira Ribeir Alves vs Iosif P. Grinberg
2014 · Result 0–1 · Italian Game: Classical Variation (C54).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Fernando Pereira Ribeir Alves vs Iosif P. Grinberg with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Fernando Pereira Ribeir Alves (1802)
- Black
- Iosif P. Grinberg (2146)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2014
- Opening
- Italian Game: Classical Variation (C54)
About this chess game
This chess game between Fernando Pereira Ribeir Alves (1802) and Iosif P. Grinberg (2146) was played in 2014 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Italian Game: Classical Variation (C54). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Fernando Pereira Ribeir Alves games or Iosif P. Grinberg games? This Fernando Pereira Ribeir Alves vs Iosif P. Grinberg encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Italian Game: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Fernando Pereira Ribeir Alves vs Iosif P. Grinberg?
Fernando Pereira Ribeir Alves vs Iosif P. Grinberg (2014) finished 0–1, a win for Iosif P. Grinberg.
What opening was played in Fernando Pereira Ribeir Alves vs Iosif P. Grinberg?
The game opened with the Italian Game: Classical Variation (ECO C54).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Fernando Pereira Ribeir Alves vs Iosif P. Grinberg, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.