Miguel Alvarez vs Romina Belen Rueda Paiva
Posadas qual, 2003 · Result 1–0 · King's Knight Opening: Normal Variation (C44).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Miguel Alvarez vs Romina Belen Rueda Paiva with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Miguel Alvarez (1934)
- Black
- Romina Belen Rueda Paiva (1700)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Posadas qual
- Year
- 2003
- Opening
- King's Knight Opening: Normal Variation (C44)
About this chess game
This chess game between Miguel Alvarez (1934) and Romina Belen Rueda Paiva (1700) was played at Posadas qual in 2003 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Knight Opening: Normal Variation (C44). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Miguel Alvarez games or Romina Belen Rueda Paiva games? This Miguel Alvarez vs Romina Belen Rueda Paiva encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Knight Opening: Normal Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Miguel Alvarez vs Romina Belen Rueda Paiva?
Miguel Alvarez vs Romina Belen Rueda Paiva (2003) finished 1–0, a win for Miguel Alvarez.
What opening was played in Miguel Alvarez vs Romina Belen Rueda Paiva?
The game opened with the King's Knight Opening: Normal Variation (ECO C44).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Miguel Alvarez vs Romina Belen Rueda Paiva, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.