Miguel Angel Alvarez Ramirez vs Va Ramos
WJun, 2009 · Result 1–0 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation (E21).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Miguel Angel Alvarez Ramirez vs Va Ramos with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Miguel Angel Alvarez Ramirez (2259)
- Black
- Va Ramos (1915)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- WJun
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation (E21)
About this chess game
This chess game between Miguel Angel Alvarez Ramirez (2259) and Va Ramos (1915) was played at WJun in 2009 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation (E21). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Miguel Angel Alvarez Ramirez games or Va Ramos games? This Miguel Angel Alvarez Ramirez vs Va Ramos encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Miguel Angel Alvarez Ramirez vs Va Ramos?
Miguel Angel Alvarez Ramirez vs Va Ramos (2009) finished 1–0, a win for Miguel Angel Alvarez Ramirez.
What opening was played in Miguel Angel Alvarez Ramirez vs Va Ramos?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation (ECO E21).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Miguel Angel Alvarez Ramirez vs Va Ramos, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.