Emilio Alvarez Marquez vs Martin Lopez Espinoza
2009 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Emilio Alvarez Marquez vs Martin Lopez Espinoza with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Emilio Alvarez Marquez (2081)
- Black
- Martin Lopez Espinoza (1834)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02)
About this chess game
This chess game between Emilio Alvarez Marquez (2081) and Martin Lopez Espinoza (1834) was played in 2009 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Emilio Alvarez Marquez games or Martin Lopez Espinoza games? This Emilio Alvarez Marquez vs Martin Lopez Espinoza encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Emilio Alvarez Marquez vs Martin Lopez Espinoza?
Emilio Alvarez Marquez vs Martin Lopez Espinoza (2009) finished 1–0, a win for Emilio Alvarez Marquez.
What opening was played in Emilio Alvarez Marquez vs Martin Lopez Espinoza?
The game opened with the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (ECO D02).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Emilio Alvarez Marquez vs Martin Lopez Espinoza, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.