Manuel Alvarez Escudero vs Daniel Campos Palacios
2011 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: French Variation (B40).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Manuel Alvarez Escudero vs Daniel Campos Palacios with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Manuel Alvarez Escudero (1866)
- Black
- Daniel Campos Palacios (1958)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: French Variation (B40)
About this chess game
This chess game between Manuel Alvarez Escudero (1866) and Daniel Campos Palacios (1958) was played in 2011 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: French Variation (B40). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Manuel Alvarez Escudero games or Daniel Campos Palacios games? This Manuel Alvarez Escudero vs Daniel Campos Palacios encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: French Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Manuel Alvarez Escudero vs Daniel Campos Palacios?
Manuel Alvarez Escudero vs Daniel Campos Palacios (2011) finished 0–1, a win for Daniel Campos Palacios.
What opening was played in Manuel Alvarez Escudero vs Daniel Campos Palacios?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: French Variation (ECO B40).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Manuel Alvarez Escudero vs Daniel Campos Palacios, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.