Amilcar Alvarez Abejon vs Cristeto Alameda Arellano
2015 · Result 1–0 · Slav Defense: Czech Variation, Classical System (D18).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Amilcar Alvarez Abejon vs Cristeto Alameda Arellano with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Amilcar Alvarez Abejon (2055)
- Black
- Cristeto Alameda Arellano (1545)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Slav Defense: Czech Variation, Classical System (D18)
About this chess game
This chess game between Amilcar Alvarez Abejon (2055) and Cristeto Alameda Arellano (1545) was played in 2015 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Slav Defense: Czech Variation, Classical System (D18). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Amilcar Alvarez Abejon games or Cristeto Alameda Arellano games? This Amilcar Alvarez Abejon vs Cristeto Alameda Arellano encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Slav Defense: Czech Variation, Classical System.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Amilcar Alvarez Abejon vs Cristeto Alameda Arellano?
Amilcar Alvarez Abejon vs Cristeto Alameda Arellano (2015) finished 1–0, a win for Amilcar Alvarez Abejon.
What opening was played in Amilcar Alvarez Abejon vs Cristeto Alameda Arellano?
The game opened with the Slav Defense: Czech Variation, Classical System (ECO D18).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Amilcar Alvarez Abejon vs Cristeto Alameda Arellano, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.