Marvia Josefina Alvarado Arcila vs Emanuel Vera Viloria
2017 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Gambit Accepted (D20).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Marvia Josefina Alvarado Arcila vs Emanuel Vera Viloria with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Marvia Josefina Alvarado Arcila (1922)
- Black
- Emanuel Vera Viloria
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Accepted (D20)
About this chess game
This chess game between Marvia Josefina Alvarado Arcila (1922) and Emanuel Vera Viloria was played in 2017 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Accepted (D20). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Marvia Josefina Alvarado Arcila games or Emanuel Vera Viloria games? This Marvia Josefina Alvarado Arcila vs Emanuel Vera Viloria encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Accepted.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Marvia Josefina Alvarado Arcila vs Emanuel Vera Viloria?
Marvia Josefina Alvarado Arcila vs Emanuel Vera Viloria (2017) finished 1–0, a win for Marvia Josefina Alvarado Arcila.
What opening was played in Marvia Josefina Alvarado Arcila vs Emanuel Vera Viloria?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Accepted (ECO D20).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Marvia Josefina Alvarado Arcila vs Emanuel Vera Viloria, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.