Ralph Althoff vs Vitaliy Garbuz
45. Sparkassen Open, 2017 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation (B47).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ralph Althoff vs Vitaliy Garbuz with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ralph Althoff (2071)
- Black
- Vitaliy Garbuz (1989)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 45. Sparkassen Open
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation (B47)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ralph Althoff (2071) and Vitaliy Garbuz (1989) was played at 45. Sparkassen Open in 2017 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation (B47). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ralph Althoff games or Vitaliy Garbuz games? This Ralph Althoff vs Vitaliy Garbuz encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ralph Althoff vs Vitaliy Garbuz?
Ralph Althoff vs Vitaliy Garbuz (2017) finished 1–0, a win for Ralph Althoff.
What opening was played in Ralph Althoff vs Vitaliy Garbuz?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation (ECO B47).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ralph Althoff vs Vitaliy Garbuz, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.