Reiner Altenburg vs Ulf Seifert
Mecklenburg VP LL1 9798, date unknown · Result 0–1 · Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Variation (D93).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Reiner Altenburg vs Ulf Seifert with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Reiner Altenburg (2018)
- Black
- Ulf Seifert
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Mecklenburg VP LL1 9798
- Opening
- Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Variation (D93)
About this chess game
This chess game between Reiner Altenburg (2018) and Ulf Seifert was played at Mecklenburg VP LL1 9798 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Variation (D93). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Reiner Altenburg games or Ulf Seifert games? This Reiner Altenburg vs Ulf Seifert encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Reiner Altenburg vs Ulf Seifert?
Reiner Altenburg vs Ulf Seifert finished 0–1, a win for Ulf Seifert.
What opening was played in Reiner Altenburg vs Ulf Seifert?
The game opened with the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Variation (ECO D93).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Reiner Altenburg vs Ulf Seifert, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.