Ignacio Alonso Herrero vs Alberto Ordonez Morales
2013 · Result 1–0 · French Defense: Exchange Variation (C01).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ignacio Alonso Herrero vs Alberto Ordonez Morales with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ignacio Alonso Herrero (1789)
- Black
- Alberto Ordonez Morales (1836)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- French Defense: Exchange Variation (C01)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ignacio Alonso Herrero (1789) and Alberto Ordonez Morales (1836) was played in 2013 and finished 1–0. The opening was the French Defense: Exchange Variation (C01). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ignacio Alonso Herrero games or Alberto Ordonez Morales games? This Ignacio Alonso Herrero vs Alberto Ordonez Morales encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Exchange Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ignacio Alonso Herrero vs Alberto Ordonez Morales?
Ignacio Alonso Herrero vs Alberto Ordonez Morales (2013) finished 1–0, a win for Ignacio Alonso Herrero.
What opening was played in Ignacio Alonso Herrero vs Alberto Ordonez Morales?
The game opened with the French Defense: Exchange Variation (ECO C01).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ignacio Alonso Herrero vs Alberto Ordonez Morales, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.