Ignacio Alonso Herrero vs Juan Jose Lopez Guitian
2012 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation (B22).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ignacio Alonso Herrero vs Juan Jose Lopez Guitian with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ignacio Alonso Herrero (1787)
- Black
- Juan Jose Lopez Guitian (1549)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation (B22)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ignacio Alonso Herrero (1787) and Juan Jose Lopez Guitian (1549) was played in 2012 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation (B22). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ignacio Alonso Herrero games or Juan Jose Lopez Guitian games? This Ignacio Alonso Herrero vs Juan Jose Lopez Guitian encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ignacio Alonso Herrero vs Juan Jose Lopez Guitian?
Ignacio Alonso Herrero vs Juan Jose Lopez Guitian (2012) finished 1–0, a win for Ignacio Alonso Herrero.
What opening was played in Ignacio Alonso Herrero vs Juan Jose Lopez Guitian?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation (ECO B22).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ignacio Alonso Herrero vs Juan Jose Lopez Guitian, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.