Oscar Alonso Bustos vs Mario Gonzalez Carrasco
ESP Ch U10, 2004 · Result 0–1 · King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (E76).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Oscar Alonso Bustos vs Mario Gonzalez Carrasco with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Oscar Alonso Bustos (1669)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- ESP Ch U10
- Year
- 2004
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (E76)
About this chess game
This chess game between Oscar Alonso Bustos (1669) and Mario Gonzalez Carrasco was played at ESP Ch U10 in 2004 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (E76). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Oscar Alonso Bustos games or Mario Gonzalez Carrasco games? This Oscar Alonso Bustos vs Mario Gonzalez Carrasco encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Oscar Alonso Bustos vs Mario Gonzalez Carrasco?
Oscar Alonso Bustos vs Mario Gonzalez Carrasco (2004) finished 0–1, a win for Mario Gonzalez Carrasco.
What opening was played in Oscar Alonso Bustos vs Mario Gonzalez Carrasco?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (ECO E76).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Oscar Alonso Bustos vs Mario Gonzalez Carrasco, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.