José Tomás Resende Almeida vs Daniel Glowinski
WS/O/487, 2011 · Result 0–1 · French Defense: Paulsen Variation (C10).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay José Tomás Resende Almeida vs Daniel Glowinski with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- José Tomás Resende Almeida (1880)
- Black
- Daniel Glowinski (1847)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- WS/O/487
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- French Defense: Paulsen Variation (C10)
About this chess game
This chess game between José Tomás Resende Almeida (1880) and Daniel Glowinski (1847) was played at WS/O/487 in 2011 and finished 0–1. The opening was the French Defense: Paulsen Variation (C10). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more José Tomás Resende Almeida games or Daniel Glowinski games? This José Tomás Resende Almeida vs Daniel Glowinski encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Paulsen Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won José Tomás Resende Almeida vs Daniel Glowinski?
José Tomás Resende Almeida vs Daniel Glowinski (2011) finished 0–1, a win for Daniel Glowinski.
What opening was played in José Tomás Resende Almeida vs Daniel Glowinski?
The game opened with the French Defense: Paulsen Variation (ECO C10).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of José Tomás Resende Almeida vs Daniel Glowinski, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.