Alvaro Alves de Almeida Junior vs Raja Panjwani
18. American Continental, 2025 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Open (B32).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alvaro Alves de Almeida Junior vs Raja Panjwani with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Alvaro Alves de Almeida Junior (2179)
- Black
- Raja Panjwani (2446)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 18. American Continental
- Year
- 2025
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Open (B32)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alvaro Alves de Almeida Junior (2179) and Raja Panjwani (2446) was played at 18. American Continental in 2025 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Open (B32). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alvaro Alves de Almeida Junior games or Raja Panjwani games? This Alvaro Alves de Almeida Junior vs Raja Panjwani encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Open.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alvaro Alves de Almeida Junior vs Raja Panjwani?
Alvaro Alves de Almeida Junior vs Raja Panjwani (2025) finished 0–1, a win for Raja Panjwani.
What opening was played in Alvaro Alves de Almeida Junior vs Raja Panjwani?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Open (ECO B32).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alvaro Alves de Almeida Junior vs Raja Panjwani, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.