Mirella Almeida Cubas vs Ricardo Lerma Gonzalez
2018 · Result 0–1 · Queen's Indian Defense: Spassky System (E14).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Mirella Almeida Cubas vs Ricardo Lerma Gonzalez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Mirella Almeida Cubas (1405)
- Black
- Ricardo Lerma Gonzalez (1838)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- Queen's Indian Defense: Spassky System (E14)
About this chess game
This chess game between Mirella Almeida Cubas (1405) and Ricardo Lerma Gonzalez (1838) was played in 2018 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Queen's Indian Defense: Spassky System (E14). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Mirella Almeida Cubas games or Ricardo Lerma Gonzalez games? This Mirella Almeida Cubas vs Ricardo Lerma Gonzalez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Indian Defense: Spassky System.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Mirella Almeida Cubas vs Ricardo Lerma Gonzalez?
Mirella Almeida Cubas vs Ricardo Lerma Gonzalez (2018) finished 0–1, a win for Ricardo Lerma Gonzalez.
What opening was played in Mirella Almeida Cubas vs Ricardo Lerma Gonzalez?
The game opened with the Queen's Indian Defense: Spassky System (ECO E14).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Mirella Almeida Cubas vs Ricardo Lerma Gonzalez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.