Jeniffer Maria Almanzar Vasquez vs Elizabeth Hazim Gonzalez
2015 · Result ½–½ · King's Pawn Game (B00).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jeniffer Maria Almanzar Vasquez vs Elizabeth Hazim Gonzalez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jeniffer Maria Almanzar Vasquez (1737)
- Black
- Elizabeth Hazim Gonzalez (1805)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- King's Pawn Game (B00)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jeniffer Maria Almanzar Vasquez (1737) and Elizabeth Hazim Gonzalez (1805) was played in 2015 and finished ½–½. The opening was the King's Pawn Game (B00). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jeniffer Maria Almanzar Vasquez games or Elizabeth Hazim Gonzalez games? This Jeniffer Maria Almanzar Vasquez vs Elizabeth Hazim Gonzalez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Pawn Game.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jeniffer Maria Almanzar Vasquez vs Elizabeth Hazim Gonzalez?
Jeniffer Maria Almanzar Vasquez vs Elizabeth Hazim Gonzalez (2015) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Jeniffer Maria Almanzar Vasquez vs Elizabeth Hazim Gonzalez?
The game opened with the King's Pawn Game (ECO B00).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jeniffer Maria Almanzar Vasquez vs Elizabeth Hazim Gonzalez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.