Pablo Almagro Llamas vs Francisco Javier Ruiz Casado
78. ch-ESP 2013, 2013 · Result 1–0 · Philidor Defense (C41).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Pablo Almagro Llamas vs Francisco Javier Ruiz Casado with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Pablo Almagro Llamas (2474)
- Black
- Francisco Javier Ruiz Casado (2029)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 78. ch-ESP 2013
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Philidor Defense (C41)
About this chess game
This chess game between Pablo Almagro Llamas (2474) and Francisco Javier Ruiz Casado (2029) was played at 78. ch-ESP 2013 in 2013 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Philidor Defense (C41). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Pablo Almagro Llamas games or Francisco Javier Ruiz Casado games? This Pablo Almagro Llamas vs Francisco Javier Ruiz Casado encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Philidor Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Pablo Almagro Llamas vs Francisco Javier Ruiz Casado?
Pablo Almagro Llamas vs Francisco Javier Ruiz Casado (2013) finished 1–0, a win for Pablo Almagro Llamas.
What opening was played in Pablo Almagro Llamas vs Francisco Javier Ruiz Casado?
The game opened with the Philidor Defense (ECO C41).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Pablo Almagro Llamas vs Francisco Javier Ruiz Casado, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.