Pablo Almagro Llamas vs Jose Candela Perez
2017 · Result ½–½ · Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Modern Steinitz Defense (C71).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Pablo Almagro Llamas vs Jose Candela Perez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Pablo Almagro Llamas (2467)
- Black
- Jose Candela Perez (2387)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Modern Steinitz Defense (C71)
About this chess game
This chess game between Pablo Almagro Llamas (2467) and Jose Candela Perez (2387) was played in 2017 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Modern Steinitz Defense (C71). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Pablo Almagro Llamas games or Jose Candela Perez games? This Pablo Almagro Llamas vs Jose Candela Perez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Modern Steinitz Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Pablo Almagro Llamas vs Jose Candela Perez?
Pablo Almagro Llamas vs Jose Candela Perez (2017) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Pablo Almagro Llamas vs Jose Candela Perez?
The game opened with the Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Modern Steinitz Defense (ECO C71).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Pablo Almagro Llamas vs Jose Candela Perez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.