Conol Hugh Alexander vs Michael John Haygarth
GBR Ch 47th, 1960 · Result ½–½ · King's Gambit Accepted: King's Knight's Gambit (C34).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Conol Hugh Alexander vs Michael John Haygarth with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Conol Hugh Alexander
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- GBR Ch 47th
- Year
- 1960
- Opening
- King's Gambit Accepted: King's Knight's Gambit (C34)
About this chess game
This chess game between Conol Hugh Alexander and Michael John Haygarth was played at GBR Ch 47th in 1960 and finished ½–½. The opening was the King's Gambit Accepted: King's Knight's Gambit (C34). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Conol Hugh Alexander games or Michael John Haygarth games? This Conol Hugh Alexander vs Michael John Haygarth encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Gambit Accepted: King's Knight's Gambit.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Conol Hugh Alexander vs Michael John Haygarth?
Conol Hugh Alexander vs Michael John Haygarth (1960) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Conol Hugh Alexander vs Michael John Haygarth?
The game opened with the King's Gambit Accepted: King's Knight's Gambit (ECO C34).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Conol Hugh Alexander vs Michael John Haygarth, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.