Carlos Alemany Esteban vs Emilio Pardinas Riano
2008 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Carlos Alemany Esteban vs Emilio Pardinas Riano with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Carlos Alemany Esteban (1917)
- Black
- Emilio Pardinas Riano (1883)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2008
- Opening
- Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02)
About this chess game
This chess game between Carlos Alemany Esteban (1917) and Emilio Pardinas Riano (1883) was played in 2008 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Carlos Alemany Esteban games or Emilio Pardinas Riano games? This Carlos Alemany Esteban vs Emilio Pardinas Riano encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Carlos Alemany Esteban vs Emilio Pardinas Riano?
Carlos Alemany Esteban vs Emilio Pardinas Riano (2008) finished 1–0, a win for Carlos Alemany Esteban.
What opening was played in Carlos Alemany Esteban vs Emilio Pardinas Riano?
The game opened with the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (ECO D02).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Carlos Alemany Esteban vs Emilio Pardinas Riano, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.