Evgeny Alekseev vs Toms Kantans
18. ch-EUR Indiv 2017, 2017 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (B92).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Evgeny Alekseev vs Toms Kantans with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Evgeny Alekseev (2615)
- Black
- Toms Kantans (2490)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 18. ch-EUR Indiv 2017
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (B92)
About this chess game
This chess game between Evgeny Alekseev (2615) and Toms Kantans (2490) was played at 18. ch-EUR Indiv 2017 in 2017 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (B92). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Evgeny Alekseev games or Toms Kantans games? This Evgeny Alekseev vs Toms Kantans encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Evgeny Alekseev vs Toms Kantans?
Evgeny Alekseev vs Toms Kantans (2017) finished 0–1, a win for Toms Kantans.
What opening was played in Evgeny Alekseev vs Toms Kantans?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (ECO B92).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Evgeny Alekseev vs Toms Kantans, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.