Aleksandar Aleksandrov vs Paulius Pultinevicius
European Rapid 2015, 2015 · Result 1–0 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation (E46).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Aleksandar Aleksandrov vs Paulius Pultinevicius with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Aleksandar Aleksandrov (1516)
- Black
- Paulius Pultinevicius (2262)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- European Rapid 2015
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation (E46)
About this chess game
This chess game between Aleksandar Aleksandrov (1516) and Paulius Pultinevicius (2262) was played at European Rapid 2015 in 2015 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation (E46). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Aleksandar Aleksandrov games or Paulius Pultinevicius games? This Aleksandar Aleksandrov vs Paulius Pultinevicius encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Aleksandar Aleksandrov vs Paulius Pultinevicius?
Aleksandar Aleksandrov vs Paulius Pultinevicius (2015) finished 1–0, a win for Aleksandar Aleksandrov.
What opening was played in Aleksandar Aleksandrov vs Paulius Pultinevicius?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation (ECO E46).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Aleksandar Aleksandrov vs Paulius Pultinevicius, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.