Laurynas Alekna vs Rimvydas Lukosius
2013 · Result 0–1 · Grünfeld Defense: Brinckmann Attack, Grünfeld Gambit Accepted (D84).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Laurynas Alekna vs Rimvydas Lukosius with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Laurynas Alekna (1730)
- Black
- Rimvydas Lukosius (1872)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Grünfeld Defense: Brinckmann Attack, Grünfeld Gambit Accepted (D84)
About this chess game
This chess game between Laurynas Alekna (1730) and Rimvydas Lukosius (1872) was played in 2013 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Grünfeld Defense: Brinckmann Attack, Grünfeld Gambit Accepted (D84). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Laurynas Alekna games or Rimvydas Lukosius games? This Laurynas Alekna vs Rimvydas Lukosius encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Grünfeld Defense: Brinckmann Attack, Grünfeld Gambit Accepted.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Laurynas Alekna vs Rimvydas Lukosius?
Laurynas Alekna vs Rimvydas Lukosius (2013) finished 0–1, a win for Rimvydas Lukosius.
What opening was played in Laurynas Alekna vs Rimvydas Lukosius?
The game opened with the Grünfeld Defense: Brinckmann Attack, Grünfeld Gambit Accepted (ECO D84).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Laurynas Alekna vs Rimvydas Lukosius, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.