Jeff Aldrich vs Eldon Dorrington
Lansing, MI, 2001 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Orthodox Variation (E85).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jeff Aldrich vs Eldon Dorrington with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jeff Aldrich (1900)
- Black
- Eldon Dorrington (1656)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Lansing, MI
- Year
- 2001
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Orthodox Variation (E85)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jeff Aldrich (1900) and Eldon Dorrington (1656) was played at Lansing, MI in 2001 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Orthodox Variation (E85). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jeff Aldrich games or Eldon Dorrington games? This Jeff Aldrich vs Eldon Dorrington encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Orthodox Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jeff Aldrich vs Eldon Dorrington?
Jeff Aldrich vs Eldon Dorrington (2001) finished 1–0, a win for Jeff Aldrich.
What opening was played in Jeff Aldrich vs Eldon Dorrington?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Orthodox Variation (ECO E85).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jeff Aldrich vs Eldon Dorrington, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.