Juan Carlos Alcala Valiente vs Hugo Soler Lopez
2015 · Result ½–½ · King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (E76).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Juan Carlos Alcala Valiente vs Hugo Soler Lopez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Juan Carlos Alcala Valiente (2119)
- Black
- Hugo Soler Lopez (1979)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (E76)
About this chess game
This chess game between Juan Carlos Alcala Valiente (2119) and Hugo Soler Lopez (1979) was played in 2015 and finished ½–½. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (E76). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Juan Carlos Alcala Valiente games or Hugo Soler Lopez games? This Juan Carlos Alcala Valiente vs Hugo Soler Lopez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Juan Carlos Alcala Valiente vs Hugo Soler Lopez?
Juan Carlos Alcala Valiente vs Hugo Soler Lopez (2015) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Juan Carlos Alcala Valiente vs Hugo Soler Lopez?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (ECO E76).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Juan Carlos Alcala Valiente vs Hugo Soler Lopez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.