Amadeo Albert Garrote vs Cesar Valentin Pascual
2017 · Result 0–1 · Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Amadeo Albert Garrote vs Cesar Valentin Pascual with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Amadeo Albert Garrote (1825)
- Black
- Cesar Valentin Pascual (2114)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02)
About this chess game
This chess game between Amadeo Albert Garrote (1825) and Cesar Valentin Pascual (2114) was played in 2017 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Amadeo Albert Garrote games or Cesar Valentin Pascual games? This Amadeo Albert Garrote vs Cesar Valentin Pascual encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Amadeo Albert Garrote vs Cesar Valentin Pascual?
Amadeo Albert Garrote vs Cesar Valentin Pascual (2017) finished 0–1, a win for Cesar Valentin Pascual.
What opening was played in Amadeo Albert Garrote vs Cesar Valentin Pascual?
The game opened with the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (ECO D02).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Amadeo Albert Garrote vs Cesar Valentin Pascual, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.