Roberto Ignacio Alarcon Bahamondez vs Pablo Calvo Salas
CHI Ch, 2010 · Result ½–½ · Four Knights Game (C47).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Roberto Ignacio Alarcon Bahamondez vs Pablo Calvo Salas with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Roberto Ignacio Alarcon Bahamondez (2154)
- Black
- Pablo Calvo Salas (2305)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- CHI Ch
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Four Knights Game (C47)
About this chess game
This chess game between Roberto Ignacio Alarcon Bahamondez (2154) and Pablo Calvo Salas (2305) was played at CHI Ch in 2010 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Four Knights Game (C47). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Roberto Ignacio Alarcon Bahamondez games or Pablo Calvo Salas games? This Roberto Ignacio Alarcon Bahamondez vs Pablo Calvo Salas encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Four Knights Game.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Roberto Ignacio Alarcon Bahamondez vs Pablo Calvo Salas?
Roberto Ignacio Alarcon Bahamondez vs Pablo Calvo Salas (2010) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Roberto Ignacio Alarcon Bahamondez vs Pablo Calvo Salas?
The game opened with the Four Knights Game (ECO C47).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Roberto Ignacio Alarcon Bahamondez vs Pablo Calvo Salas, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.