Vladimir Akopian vs Vladislav Artemiev
FIDE World Blitz 2013, 2013 · Result ½–½ · Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit (A07).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Vladimir Akopian vs Vladislav Artemiev with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Vladimir Akopian (2691)
- Black
- Vladislav Artemiev (2524)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- FIDE World Blitz 2013
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit (A07)
About this chess game
This chess game between Vladimir Akopian (2691) and Vladislav Artemiev (2524) was played at FIDE World Blitz 2013 in 2013 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit (A07). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Vladimir Akopian games or Vladislav Artemiev games? This Vladimir Akopian vs Vladislav Artemiev encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Vladimir Akopian vs Vladislav Artemiev?
Vladimir Akopian vs Vladislav Artemiev (2013) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Vladimir Akopian vs Vladislav Artemiev?
The game opened with the Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit (ECO A07).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Vladimir Akopian vs Vladislav Artemiev, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.