Al Khatib Ahmad vs Hesham Alkhoori Abdulla
Riyadh Calendar Chess, 2023 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation (B51).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Al Khatib Ahmad vs Hesham Alkhoori Abdulla with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Al Khatib Ahmad (2303)
- Black
- Hesham Alkhoori Abdulla (2412)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- Riyadh Calendar Chess
- Year
- 2023
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation (B51)
About this chess game
This chess game between Al Khatib Ahmad (2303) and Hesham Alkhoori Abdulla (2412) was played at Riyadh Calendar Chess in 2023 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation (B51). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Al Khatib Ahmad games or Hesham Alkhoori Abdulla games? This Al Khatib Ahmad vs Hesham Alkhoori Abdulla encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Al Khatib Ahmad vs Hesham Alkhoori Abdulla?
Al Khatib Ahmad vs Hesham Alkhoori Abdulla (2023) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Al Khatib Ahmad vs Hesham Alkhoori Abdulla?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation (ECO B51).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Al Khatib Ahmad vs Hesham Alkhoori Abdulla, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.