Gustavo Aguilera vs Jorge Fuentes Medrano
2. JAHV McGregor Open, 2011 · Result 0–1 · King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Rare Defenses (E90).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Gustavo Aguilera vs Jorge Fuentes Medrano with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Gustavo Aguilera
- Black
- Jorge Fuentes Medrano (1699)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 2. JAHV McGregor Open
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Rare Defenses (E90)
About this chess game
This chess game between Gustavo Aguilera and Jorge Fuentes Medrano (1699) was played at 2. JAHV McGregor Open in 2011 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Rare Defenses (E90). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Gustavo Aguilera games or Jorge Fuentes Medrano games? This Gustavo Aguilera vs Jorge Fuentes Medrano encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Rare Defenses.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Gustavo Aguilera vs Jorge Fuentes Medrano?
Gustavo Aguilera vs Jorge Fuentes Medrano (2011) finished 0–1, a win for Jorge Fuentes Medrano.
What opening was played in Gustavo Aguilera vs Jorge Fuentes Medrano?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Rare Defenses (ECO E90).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Gustavo Aguilera vs Jorge Fuentes Medrano, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.