Natalia Andrea Aguilar vs Jackeline Salcedo Paez
2012 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Natalia Andrea Aguilar vs Jackeline Salcedo Paez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Natalia Andrea Aguilar (1939)
- Black
- Jackeline Salcedo Paez (1980)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02)
About this chess game
This chess game between Natalia Andrea Aguilar (1939) and Jackeline Salcedo Paez (1980) was played in 2012 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Natalia Andrea Aguilar games or Jackeline Salcedo Paez games? This Natalia Andrea Aguilar vs Jackeline Salcedo Paez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Natalia Andrea Aguilar vs Jackeline Salcedo Paez?
Natalia Andrea Aguilar vs Jackeline Salcedo Paez (2012) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Natalia Andrea Aguilar vs Jackeline Salcedo Paez?
The game opened with the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (ECO D02).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Natalia Andrea Aguilar vs Jackeline Salcedo Paez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.