Robert Aghasaryan vs Vladislav Kovalev
2010 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Panno Main Line (E84).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Robert Aghasaryan vs Vladislav Kovalev with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Robert Aghasaryan (2287)
- Black
- Vladislav Kovalev (2329)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Panno Main Line (E84)
About this chess game
This chess game between Robert Aghasaryan (2287) and Vladislav Kovalev (2329) was played in 2010 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Panno Main Line (E84). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Robert Aghasaryan games or Vladislav Kovalev games? This Robert Aghasaryan vs Vladislav Kovalev encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Panno Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Robert Aghasaryan vs Vladislav Kovalev?
Robert Aghasaryan vs Vladislav Kovalev (2010) finished 1–0, a win for Robert Aghasaryan.
What opening was played in Robert Aghasaryan vs Vladislav Kovalev?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Panno Main Line (ECO E84).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Robert Aghasaryan vs Vladislav Kovalev, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.