Ali Jalal Adil vs Khalid Khudhair Khalaf Albu-Salih
2013 · Result ½–½ · Bishop's Opening: Berlin Defense (C24).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ali Jalal Adil vs Khalid Khudhair Khalaf Albu-Salih with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ali Jalal Adil (2270)
- Black
- Khalid Khudhair Khalaf Albu-Salih (2135)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Bishop's Opening: Berlin Defense (C24)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ali Jalal Adil (2270) and Khalid Khudhair Khalaf Albu-Salih (2135) was played in 2013 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Bishop's Opening: Berlin Defense (C24). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ali Jalal Adil games or Khalid Khudhair Khalaf Albu-Salih games? This Ali Jalal Adil vs Khalid Khudhair Khalaf Albu-Salih encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Bishop's Opening: Berlin Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ali Jalal Adil vs Khalid Khudhair Khalaf Albu-Salih?
Ali Jalal Adil vs Khalid Khudhair Khalaf Albu-Salih (2013) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Ali Jalal Adil vs Khalid Khudhair Khalaf Albu-Salih?
The game opened with the Bishop's Opening: Berlin Defense (ECO C24).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ali Jalal Adil vs Khalid Khudhair Khalaf Albu-Salih, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.