B. Adhiban vs Nasib Ginting
9. Asian Continental, 2010 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Traditional Variation (B63).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay B. Adhiban vs Nasib Ginting with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- B. Adhiban (2510)
- Black
- Nasib Ginting (2397)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 9. Asian Continental
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Traditional Variation (B63)
About this chess game
This chess game between B. Adhiban (2510) and Nasib Ginting (2397) was played at 9. Asian Continental in 2010 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Traditional Variation (B63). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more B. Adhiban games or Nasib Ginting games? This B. Adhiban vs Nasib Ginting encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Traditional Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won B. Adhiban vs Nasib Ginting?
B. Adhiban vs Nasib Ginting (2010) finished 1–0, a win for B. Adhiban.
What opening was played in B. Adhiban vs Nasib Ginting?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Traditional Variation (ECO B63).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of B. Adhiban vs Nasib Ginting, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.