Pedro Aderito vs Eduardo A Pascoal
CUCA Open, 2011 · Result 1–0 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Classical Defense (E48).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Pedro Aderito vs Eduardo A Pascoal with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Pedro Aderito (1353)
- Black
- Eduardo A Pascoal (2210)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- CUCA Open
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Classical Defense (E48)
About this chess game
This chess game between Pedro Aderito (1353) and Eduardo A Pascoal (2210) was played at CUCA Open in 2011 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Classical Defense (E48). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Pedro Aderito games or Eduardo A Pascoal games? This Pedro Aderito vs Eduardo A Pascoal encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Classical Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Pedro Aderito vs Eduardo A Pascoal?
Pedro Aderito vs Eduardo A Pascoal (2011) finished 1–0, a win for Pedro Aderito.
What opening was played in Pedro Aderito vs Eduardo A Pascoal?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Classical Defense (ECO E48).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Pedro Aderito vs Eduardo A Pascoal, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.